Innovation and Design of a Web‐Based Pain Education Interprofessional Resource Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • INTRODUCTION: The present article describes educational innovation processes and design of a web‐based pain interprofessional resource for prelicensure health science students in universities across Canada. Operationalization of educational theory in design coupled with formative evaluation of design are discussed, along with strategies that support collaborative innovation.METHODS: Educational design was driven by content, theory and evaluation. Pain misbeliefs and teaching points along the continuum from acute to persistent pain were identified. Knowledge‐building theory, situated learning, reflection and novel designs for cognitive scaffolding were then employed. Design research principles were incorporated to inform iterative and ongoing design.RESULTS: An authentic patient case was constructed, situated in inter‐professional complex care to highlight learning objectives related to pre‐operative, postoperative and treatment up to one year, for a surgical cancer patient. Pain mechanisms, assessment and management framed content creation. Knowledge building scaffolds were used, which included video simulations, embedded resources, concurrent feedback, practice‐based reflective exercises and commentaries. Scaffolds were refined to specifically support knowledge translation. Illustrative commentaries were designed to explicate pain misbeliefs and best practices. Architecture of the resource was mapped; a multimedia, interactive prototype was created. This pain education resource was developed primarily for individual use, with extensions for interprofessional collective discourse.DISCUSSION: Translation of curricular content scripts into representation maps supported the collaborative design process by establishing a common visual language. The web‐based prototype will be formatively and summatively evaluated to assess pedagogic design, knowledge‐translation scaffolds, pain knowledge gains, relevance, feasibility and fidelity of this educational innovation.

authors

  • Lax, Leila
  • Watt-Watson, Judy
  • Lui, Michelle
  • Dubrowski, Adam
  • McGillion, Michael
  • Hunter, Judith
  • MacLennan, Cameron
  • Knickle, Kerry
  • Robb, Anja
  • Lapeyre, Jaime

publication date

  • January 2011