Journal article
Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: a study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial
Abstract
BackgroundStress, depression, and anxiety affect 15% to 25% of pregnant women. However, substantial barriers to psychosocial assessment exist, resulting in less than 20% of prenatal care providers assessing and treating mental health problems. Moreover, pregnant women are often reluctant to disclose their mental health concerns to a healthcare provider. Identifying screening and assessment tools and procedures that are acceptable to both women …
Authors
Kingston D; McDonald S; Biringer A; Austin M-P; Hegadoren K; McDonald S; Giallo R; Ohinmaa A; Lasiuk G; MacQueen G
Journal
Trials, Vol. 15, No. 1, 
Publisher
Springer Nature
Publication Date
December 2014
DOI
10.1186/1745-6215-15-3
ISSN
1468-6708
Associated Experts
Fields of Research (FoR)
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AnxietyCanadaClinical ProtocolsComputers, HandheldDepressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMental HealthMental Health ServicesPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CarePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsResearch DesignRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban Health Services