Journal article
A probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis following major trauma.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the absence of major contraindications, treatment guidelines recommend that, following a major traumatic event, all patients receive low molecular weight heparin (e.g. enoxaparin) as thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus low dose unfractionated heparin (UH) for the prophylaxis of DVT following major trauma.
Authors
Lynd LD; Goeree R; Crowther MA; O'Brien BJ
Journal
Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. e215–e226
Publication Date
2007
ISSN
1710-6222
Associated Experts
Fields of Research (FoR)
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAnticoagulantsBayes TheoremCanadaCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support TechniquesDecision TreesDrug CostsEnoxaparinFemaleHemorrhageHeparinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesMaleModels, EconomicModels, StatisticalPractice Guidelines as TopicProbabilityPulmonary EmbolismTrauma Severity IndicesTreatment OutcomeVenous ThrombosisWounds and InjuriesClinical Trials as Topic