Polygenic Risk Score Analysis of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A CAN-BIND-1 Study Report: Analyse des résultats du traitement antidépresseur à l'aide des scores de risque polygéniques : Rapport sur l'étude CAN-BIND-1.
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
ObjectiveThe genetic architecture of antidepressant response is poorly understood. This study investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for major psychiatric disorders and a personality trait (neuroticism) are associated with antidepressant treatment outcomes.MethodsWe analysed 148 participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) from the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network for Depression-1 (CAN-BIND-1) cohort. Participants initially received escitalopram (ESC) monotherapy for 8 weeks. Nonresponders at week 8 received augmentation with aripiprazole (ARI), while responders continued ESC until week 16. Primary outcomes were remission status and symptom improvement measured at weeks 8 and 16. At week 16, post-hoc stratified analyses were performed by treatment arm (ESC-only vs. ESC + ARI). Eleven PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies of psychiatric disorders (e.g., MDD and post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD)) and neuroticism, were analysed for associations with these outcomes using logistic and linear regression models.ResultsAt week 8, a higher PRS for PTSD was nominally associated with a lower probability of remission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.08 [0.014-0.42], empirical p-value = 0.017) and reduced symptom improvement (beta (standard error) = -29.15 (9.76), empirical p-value = 0.019). Similarly, a higher PRS for MDD was nominally associated with decreased remission probability (OR = 0.38 [0.18-0.78], empirical p-value = 0.044). However, none of the results survived multiple testing corrections. At week 16, the stratified analysis for the ESC-only group revealed that a higher PRS for MDD was associated with increased remission probability (empirical p-value = 0.034) and greater symptom improvement (empirical p-value = 0.02). In contrast, higher PRSs for schizophrenia (empirical p-value = 0.013) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (empirical p-value = 0.032) were associated with lower symptom improvement. No significant associations were observed in the ESC + ARI group.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that PRSs may influence treatment outcomes, particularly in ESC monotherapy. Replication in larger studies is needed to validate these observations.
