Cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to primary care for influenza-like-illness: economic evaluation alongside the randomised controlled ALIC4E trial in 15 European countries Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • AbstractBackgroundOseltamivir is usually not often prescribed (or reimbursed) for non-high-risk patients consulting for influenza-like-illness (ILI) in primary care in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to usual primary care in adults/adolescents (13 years +) and children with ILI during seasonal influenza epidemics, using data collected in an open-label, multi-season, randomised controlled trial of oseltamivir in 15 European countries.MethodsDirect and indirect cost estimates were based on patient reported resource use and official country-specific unit costs. Health-Related Quality of Life was assessed by EQ-5D questionnaires. Costs and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) were bootstrapped (N = 10,000) to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), from both the healthcare payers’ and the societal perspectives, with uncertainty expressed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and expected value for perfect information (EVPI) analysis. Additionally, scenario (self-reported spending), comorbidities subgroup and country-specific analyses were performed.ResultsThe healthcare payers’ expected ICERs of oseltamivir were €22,459 per QALY gained in adults/adolescents and €13,001 in children. From the societal perspective, oseltamivir was cost-saving in adults/adolescents, but the ICER is €8,344 in children. Large uncertainties were observed in subgroups with comorbidities, especially for children. The expected ICERs and extent of decision uncertainty varied between countries (EVPI ranged €1–€35 per patient).ConclusionAdding oseltamivir to primary usual care in Europe is likely to be cost-effective for treating adults/adolescents and children with ILI from the healthcare payers’ perspective (if willingness-to-pay per QALY gained > €22,459) and cost-saving in adults/adolescents from a societal perspective.

authors

  • Li, Xiao
  • Bilcke, Joke
  • van der Velden, Alike W
  • Bruyndonckx, Robin
  • Coenen, Samuel
  • Bongard, Emily
  • de Paor, Muirrean
  • Chlabicz, Slawomir
  • Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
  • Francis, Nick
  • Aabenhus, Rune
  • Bucher, Heiner C
  • Colliers, Annelies
  • De Sutter, An
  • Garcia-Sangenis, Ana
  • Glinz, Dominik
  • Harbin, Nicolay J
  • Kosiek, Katarzyna
  • Lindbæk, Morten
  • Lionis, Christos
  • Llor, Carl
  • Mikó-Pauer, Réka
  • Radzeviciene Jurgute, Ruta
  • Seifert, Bohumil
  • Sundvall, Pär-Daniel
  • Touboul Lundgren, Pia
  • Tsakountakis, Nikolaos
  • Verheij, Theo J
  • Goossens, Herman
  • Butler, Christopher
  • Beutels, Philippe
  • Bongard, Emily
  • de Paor, Muirrean
  • Chlabicz, Slawomir
  • Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
  • Francis, Nick
  • Aabenhus, Rune
  • Bucher, Heiner C
  • Colliers, Annelies
  • De Sutter, An
  • Garcia-Sangenis, Ana
  • Glinz, Dominik
  • Harbin, Nicolay J
  • Kosiek, Katarzyna
  • Lindbæk, Morten
  • Lionis, Christos
  • Llor, Carl
  • Mikó-Pauer, Réka
  • Radzeviciene Jurgute, Ruta
  • Seifert, Bohumil
  • Sundvall, Pär-Daniel
  • Touboul Lundgren, Pia
  • Tsakountakis, Nikolaos

publication date

  • August 2023