Journal article
Outcomes assessment in the SPRINT multicenter tibial fracture trial: Adjudication committee size has trivial effect on trial results
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how the size of an outcome adjudication committee, and the potential for dominance among its members, potentially impacts a trial's results.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the six-member adjudication committee in the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) Trial. We modeled the adjudication process, predicted the …
Authors
Simunovic N; Walter S; Devereaux PJ; Sprague S; Guyatt GH; Schemitsch E; Tornetta P; Sanders D; Swiontkowski M; Bhandari M
Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 64, No. 9, pp. 1023–1033
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
September 2011
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.007
ISSN
0895-4356
Associated Experts
Fields of Research (FoR)
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Bone NailsCommittee MembershipConsensusDecision MakingFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFractures, ClosedFractures, OpenHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsProfessional Staff CommitteesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocial DominanceTibial FracturesTime Factors