Type 2 Diabetes Remission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nonsurgical Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Evidence that type 2 diabetes can be reversed has been limited by the understanding and implementation of these interventions. PURPOSE: We assessed the effect of nonsurgical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on type 2 diabetes remission and characterized core components. DATA SOURCES: We reviewed articles from MEDLINE and Embase (inception to April 2025). STUDY SELECTION: RCTs of multimodal pharmacological or nonpharmacological type 2 diabetes remission interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Study characteristics and outcomes for clinical/population health, patient-reported, and adverse event were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: We performed a random-effects multilevel meta-analysis of studies, grouped based on type of intervention and by length of follow-up. A total of 18 studies were included in this review from 11 different countries. There was a higher likelihood of achieving type 2 diabetes remission through multimodal interventions (risk ratio [RR] 1.75 [95% CI 1.49-2.04]) and for nonpharmacological interventions (RR 5.80 [95% CI 4.28-7.87]), compared with the control group. Other significant outcomes for intervention groups compared with control groups included change in A1C, weight loss, and quality of life and improvements in adverse events of hypoglycemia. LIMITATIONS: There was heterogeneity in our small pool of included studies (diversity of nonpharmacological components), stringent intervention protocols, narrow participant selection criteria, and lack of consistent diabetes remission definitions. CONCLUSIONS: With specific protocols, a variety of tailored approaches can induce type 2 diabetes remission for patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes who are able to subscribe to strict protocols. Consideration of long-term sustainability and effectiveness is needed in future research, along with patient preferences.