Home
Scholarly Works
Measurement of Functional Residual Capacity by...
Journal article

Measurement of Functional Residual Capacity by Sulfur Hexafluoride in Small-Volume Lungs during Spontaneous Breathing and Mechanical Ventilation

Abstract

ABSTRACT: We modified a sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) washout technique to allow functional residual capacity (FRC) determinations in small-volume lungs both during spontaneous breathing and controlled mechanical ventilation. This method facilitates measurements in subjects who attempt spontaneous breaths between ventilator-generated breaths. We wished to confirm the accuracy and precision of the measurements and the method's sensitivity to change. The method uses a pneumotach together with a fast, mainstream infrared SF6 sensor mounted between the endotracheal tube and the ventilator circuit. A low flow of pure SF6 is delivered into the constant gas flow of the ventilator circuit to wash in tracer gas at a concentration of less than 2%. The flow signal and the instantaneous SF6 concentration is processed on-line by a computer. The calibration of the SF6 sensor's nonlinear signal and the ability of the flow sensor to reflect flow values precisely near zero flow had a major impact on the accuracy of the FRC estimate. This accuracy was tested by comparing measured FRC values with a dummy lung's true FRC that was varied from 7 to 70 mL. The comparison differed by 0.7 ± 3.2% (mean ± SD; range, −5.1 to 7.8%). As a measure of reproducibility (precision) across 20 FRC determinations in five adult rabbits, the average coefficient of variation was 1.7% (range, 0.57 to 4.33%) during continuous positive airway pressure and 1.98% (range, 0.35 to 3.81%) during controlled mechanical ventilation. The method proved sensitive to changes in FRC related to changes in airway pressure. We conclude that SF6 washout allowed unbiased and precise FRC measurements under the circumstances of this study in the range of 5 to 100 mL of FRC.

Authors

Schulze A; Schaller P; Töpfer A; Kirpalani H

Journal

Pediatric Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 494–498

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

April 1, 1994

DOI

10.1203/00006450-199404000-00020

ISSN

0031-3998

Contact the Experts team