Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback

Scholarly Works

A comparison between integrating clinical practice...

Journal article

A comparison between integrating clinical practice setting and randomized controlled trial setting into economic evaluation models of therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness analyses generated from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent results obtained under ideal experimental conditions (efficacy) and the applicability of these data to real-world settings (effectiveness) may be questionable. OBJECTIVE: To compare cost-effectiveness results obtained from a RCT setting with the results derived from community-based clinical practice.

Authors

Farahani P; Levine M; Goeree R

Journal

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 463–470

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

August 2006

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00731.x

ISSN

1356-1294

Associated Experts

Mitchell Arnold Levine

Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences

Ron Goeree

Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Health Sciences

Labels

Fields of Research (FoR)

32 Biomedical and clinical sciences 3202 Clinical Sciences 42 Health sciences

Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)

3 Good Health and Well Being

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Arthritis, Rheumatoid Cohort Studies Community Medicine Cost-Benefit Analysis Etanercept Evidence-Based Medicine Humans Immunoglobulin G Models, Economic Practice Patterns, Physicians'Quality-Adjusted Life Years Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor

View published work (Non-McMaster Users)

View published work (McMaster Users)