Comparative analysis of work-related factors associated with burnout and its dimensions among nursing faculty in Canada and the United States.
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate and compare burnout and its dimensions-exhaustion, cynicism and professional efficacy-across workplace and socio-demographic characteristics among nursing faculty in Canada and the United States (U.S.). BACKGROUND: Burnout among nursing faculty affects the availability and retention of educators, crucial for producing qualified nurses to meet healthcare demands. Despite its significance, research in this area remains limited. DESIGN: A correlational cross-sectional survey was used. METHODS: An online survey was administered to 640 nursing faculty in Canada and 111 in the U.S. Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory and multivariate linear regression identified predictors of burnout. RESULTS: Overall, 62.4 % of participants reported moderate to high burnout. Canadian faculty were primarily involved in undergraduate and graduate education, whereas U.S. faculty devoted more time to service activities. Predictors of burnout and its dimensions varied by country. In Canada, older faculty (≥60 years) and those with a nursing diploma reported lower burnout, while those with a Doctor of Nursing Practice reported higher levels. In the U.S., burnout was higher among younger faculty (≤39 years), those with more teaching hours and lower among non-tenured faculty. CONCLUSION: Factors influencing burnout differ between Canada and the U.S., reflecting variations in academic environments. Tailored interventions, such as workload balancing and targeted support, are essential for addressing burnout and improving faculty retention.
