Nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage on noncontrast head CT: An accuracy, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability study Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (NAPSAH) on Noncontrast Head CT (NCCT) between numerous raters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 45 NCCT of adult patients with SAH who also had a catheter angiography (CA) were independently evaluated by 48 diverse raters; 45 raters performed a second assessment one month later. For each case, raters were asked: 1) whether they judged the bleeding pattern to be perimesencephalic; 2) whether there was blood anterior to brainstem; 3) complete filling of the anterior interhemispheric fissure (AIF); 4) extension to the lateral part of the sylvian fissure (LSF); 5) frank intraventricular hemorrhage; 6) whether in the hypothetical presence of a negative CT angiogram they would still recommend CA. An automatic NAPSAH diagnosis was also generated by combining responses to questions 2-5. Reliability was estimated using Gwet's AC1 (κG), and the relationship between the NCCT diagnosis of NAPSAH and the recommendation to perform CA using Cramer's V test. Multi-rater accuracy of NCCT in predicting negative CA was explored. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability for the presence of NAPSAH was moderate (κG = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.47, 0.69), but improved to substantial when automatically generated (κG = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.81). The most reliable criteria were the absence of AIF filling (κG = 0.79) and extension to LSF (κG = 0.79). Mean intra-rater reliability was substantial (κG = 0.65). NAPSAH weakly correlated with CA decision (V = 0.50). Mean sensitivity and specificity were 58% (95%CI: 44%, 71%) and 83 % (95%CI: 72 %, 94%), respectively. CONCLUSION: NAPSAH remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The NCCT diagnosis was moderately reliable and its impact on clinical decisions modest.

authors

  • Omar, Abdelsimar II
  • Benomar, Anass
  • Diestro, Jose Danilo B
  • Darabid, Houssam
  • Saydy, Karim
  • Tzaneva, Lora
  • Li, Jimmy
  • Zarour, Eleyine
  • Tanguay, William
  • El Sayed, Nohad
  • Padilha, Igor Gomes
  • Létourneau-Guillon, Laurent
  • Bard, Céline
  • Nelson, Kristoff
  • Weill, Alain
  • Roy, Daniel
  • Eneling, Johanna
  • Boisseau, William
  • Nguyen, Thanh N
  • Abdalkader, Mohamad
  • Najjar, Ahmed A
  • Nehme, Ahmad
  • Lemoine, Émile
  • Jacquin, Gregory
  • Bergeron, David
  • Brunette-Clément, Tristan
  • Chaalala, Chiraz
  • Bojanowski, Michel W
  • Labidi, Moujahed
  • Jabre, Roland
  • Ignacio, Katrina HD
  • Omar, Abdelsimar T
  • Volders, David
  • Dmytriw, Adam A
  • Hak, Jean-François
  • Forestier, Géraud
  • Holay, Quentin
  • Olatunji, Richard
  • Alhabli, Ibrahim
  • Nico, Lorena
  • Shankar, Jai JS
  • Guenego, Adrien
  • Pascual, Jose LR
  • Marotta, Thomas R
  • Errázuriz, Juan I
  • Lin, Amy W
  • Alves, Aderaldo Costa
  • Fahed, Robert
  • Hawkes, Christine
  • Lee, Hubert
  • Magro, Elsa
  • Sheikhi, Lila
  • Darsaut, Tim E
  • Raymond, Jean

publication date

  • June 2024