Sampling pattern discrepancy in the application of compressed sensing hyperpolarized xenon‐129 lung MRI
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractAlthough hyperpolarized (HP) 129Xe ventilation MRI can be carried out within a breath hold, it is still challenging for many sick patients. Compressed sensing (CS) is a viable alternative to accelerate this approach. However, undersampled images with identical sampling ratios differ from one another. Twenty subjects (n = 10 healthy and n = 10 patients with asthma) were scanned using a GE MR750 3 T scanner, acquiring fully sampled 2D multi‐slice HP 129Xe lung ventilation images (10 s breath hold, 128 × 80 (FE × PE—frequency encoding × phase encoding) and 16 slices). Using fully sampled data, 500 variable‐density Cartesian random undersampling patterns were generated, each at eight different sampling ratios from 10% to 80%. The parallel imaging and compressed sensing (PICS) command from BART was employed to reconstruct undersampled data. The signal to noise ratio (SNR), structural similarity index measurement (SSIM) and sidelobe to peak ratio of each were subsequently compared. There was a high degree of variation in both SNR and SSIM results from each of the 500 masks of each sampling rate. As the undersampling increases, there is more variation in the quantifying metrics, for both healthy and asthmatic individuals. Our study shows that random undersampling poses a significant challenge when applied at sampling ratios less than 60%, despite fulfilling CS's incoherency criteria. Such low sampling ratios will result in a large variety of undersampling patterns. Therefore, skipped segments of k‐space cannot be allowed to happen randomly at low sampling rates. By optimizing the sampling pattern, CS will reach its full potential and be able to be applied to a highly undersampled 129Xe lung dataset.
