The next generation of researchers:One‐yearoutcome data from theSAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education(ARMED MedEd) program
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractIntroductionAs the field of medical education evolves, there is a need to increase the quality of education scholarship and develop a cadre of research scholars; however, clinician educators (CEs) considering this career transition have limited formal training in education research methodology to heed this call. Therefore, a program that provides more advanced training in education scholarship for CEs without the financial and resource barriers of fellowships and masters programs is needed.MethodsThe SAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education (ARMED MedEd) program is a longitudinal program for the beyond‐beginner CE, seeking advanced training in education research. The program was created using a comprehensive needs assessment and included longitudinal training; small‐group projects; dedicated project mentors; and integrated diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Program participants applied for a grant upon program completion.ResultsTwenty‐one participants completed the course with 100% completing the baseline survey and 67% (14/21) completing the end‐of‐program survey. Participants reported improved perception of knowledge across all of the topics with a medium to large effect size, ranging from 0.40 to 0.62. When asked about impact on their network of potential collaborators, participants reported a median of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 5–8) out of 9. When asked about the impact on their community of practice, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 5–7) out of 9. When asked about the impact on their professional identity, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 4–9) out of 9. Participants also reported an increase in both the quantity (mean of 2 ± 1 new mentors) and the quality (median score 7 [IQR 5–8] out of 9) of new research mentorship as a result of the program. Open‐ended feedback was generally positive, with 100% reporting they would advise others to take this program.ConclusionsThe SAEM ARMED MedEd program represents a proof of concept for an advanced education research program seeking to fill the research training gap for the beyond‐beginner Clinician educators.
