Journal article
Propensity score matched comparison of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the SIMPLE and EFFORTLESS studies
Abstract
Aims: Comparison of outcomes between subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD and TV-ICD) therapy is hampered by varying patient characteristics and complication definitions. The aim of this analysis is to compare clinical outcomes of S-ICD and TV-ICD therapy in a matched cohort.
Methods and results: Patients implanted with de novo implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without need for pacing were selected …
Authors
Brouwer TF; Knops RE; Kutyifa V; Barr C; Mondésert B; Boersma LVA; Lambiase PD; Wold N; Jones PW; Healey JS
Journal
EP Europace, Vol. 20, No. FI2, pp. f240–f248
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Date
September 1, 2018
DOI
10.1093/europace/euy083
ISSN
1099-5129
Associated Experts
Fields of Research (FoR)
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedArrhythmias, CardiacDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric CountershockFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicPropensity ScoreProsthesis ImplantationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome