Home
Scholarly Works
Comparison of Infant Vitamin D Supplement Use...
Journal article

Comparison of Infant Vitamin D Supplement Use Among Canadian-Born, Immigrant, and Refugee Mothers

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compares knowledge and practice of infant vitamin D supplementation among immigrant, refugee, and Canadian-born mothers. METHOD: Focus group discussions with 94 mothers of children aged 0 to 3 years recruited from early childhood centers and a refugee health clinic. FINDINGS: Both immigrant and Canadian-born mothers indicated good knowledge and use of infant vitamin D supplementation. In contrast, Canadian government-assisted refugees were less likely to supplement with vitamin D. The main source of information about vitamin D was public health prenatal classes. Many mothers reported inconsistent guidance from health care providers. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Exclusively breastfed infants of refugees may be more at risk of vitamin D deficiency. All mothers require clear recommendations, both in clinical and public health settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Mothers, both new Canadian and Canadian-born, require clear and consistent messaging from health professionals. Refugee mothers, however, require more educational support to promote infant vitamin D supplementation.

Authors

Moffat T; Sellen D; Wilson W; Anderson L; Chadwick S; Amarra S

Journal

Journal of Transcultural Nursing, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 261–269

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Publication Date

January 1, 2015

DOI

10.1177/1043659614531793

ISSN

1043-6596

Contact the Experts team