Home
Scholarly Works
Is there a clinically significant gender bias in...
Journal article

Is there a clinically significant gender bias in post-myocardial infarction pharmacological management in the older (>60) population of a primary care practice?

Abstract

BackgroundDifferences in the management of coronary artery disease between men and women have been reported in the literature. There are few studies of potential inequalities of treatment that arise from a primary care context. This study investigated the existence of such inequalities in the medical management of post myocardial infarction in older patients.MethodsA comprehensive chart audit was conducted of 142 men and 81 women in an academic primary care practice. Variables were extracted on demographic variables, cardiovascular risk factors, medical and non-medical management of myocardial infarction.ResultsWomen were older than men. The groups were comparable in terms of cardiac risk factors. A statistically significant difference (14.6%: 95% CI 0.048–28.7 p = 0.047) was found between men and women for the prescription of lipid lowering medications. 25.3% (p = 0.0005, CI 11.45, 39.65) more men than women had undergone angiography, and 14.4 % (p = 0.029, CI 2.2, 26.6) more men than women had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery.ConclusionWomen are less likely than men to receive lipid-lowering medication which may indicate less aggressive secondary prevention in the primary care setting.

Authors

Di Cecco R; Patel U; Upshur RE

Journal

BMC Primary Care, Vol. 3, No. 1,

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

May 3, 2002

DOI

10.1186/1471-2296-3-8

ISSN

1471-2296

Contact the Experts team