Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Meta-Analysis Comparing Bivalirudin Versus Heparin...
Journal article

Meta-Analysis Comparing Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Monotherapy on Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract

With femoral access, bivalirudin decreases risks of major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and provides better net clinical benefit compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Whether this benefit exists compared to UFH monotherapy is less clear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral PCI with UFH or …

Authors

Bertrand OF; Jolly SS; Rao SV; Patel T; Belle L; Bernat I; Parodi G; Costerousse O; Mann T

Journal

The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 110, No. 4, pp. 599–606

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

August 2012

DOI

10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.051

ISSN

0002-9149