A strategy of Day14 bone marrows and early intervention is not superior to a strategy of noDay14 bone marrows and delayed intervention in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

We conducted a retrospective study of 364 acute myeloid leukemia patients treated using a Day14 or a noDay14 strategy. Under the Day14 strategy, patients received an interim marrow at 7-10 days following chemotherapy and, in case of residual disease, received immediate reinduction chemotherapy. Under the noDay14 strategy patients were only evaluated at end-of-induction (EOI). Overall induction mortality was higher in the Day14 cohort (8.3 vs. 3.6%, p = .12) but rates of remission (75.4 vs. 83%, p = .13) and refractory disease (14.3 vs. 13.4%, p = .87) at EOI were similar in the Day14 and noDay14 cohorts as were relapse rates (37.9% vs. 34.3%, p = .616), median relapse-free survival (14.8 vs. 15 months, p = .658) and median overall survival (25.3 vs. 37.2 months, p = .264). In multivariate analysis, the use of a Day14 strategy did not impact outcomes suggesting that a Day14 strategy is not superior to a noDay14 strategy.