Journal article
Why are outcomes different for registry patients enrolled prospectively and retrospectively? Insights from the global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF)
Abstract
Aims: Retrospective and prospective observational studies are designed to reflect real-world evidence on clinical practice, but can yield conflicting results. The GARFIELD-AF Registry includes both methods of enrolment and allows analysis of differences in patient characteristics and outcomes that may result.
Methods and results: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ≥1 risk factor for stroke at diagnosis of AF were recruited either …
Authors
Fox KAA; Accetta G; Pieper KS; Bassand J-P; Camm AJ; Fitzmaurice DA; Kayani G; Kakkar AK; Investigators FTG-A
Journal
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 27–35
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Date
January 1, 2018
DOI
10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx030
ISSN
2058-5225