Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Why are outcomes different for registry patients...
Journal article

Why are outcomes different for registry patients enrolled prospectively and retrospectively? Insights from the global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF)

Abstract

Aims: Retrospective and prospective observational studies are designed to reflect real-world evidence on clinical practice, but can yield conflicting results. The GARFIELD-AF Registry includes both methods of enrolment and allows analysis of differences in patient characteristics and outcomes that may result. Methods and results: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ≥1 risk factor for stroke at diagnosis of AF were recruited either …

Authors

Fox KAA; Accetta G; Pieper KS; Bassand J-P; Camm AJ; Fitzmaurice DA; Kayani G; Kakkar AK; Investigators FTG-A

Journal

European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 27–35

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Publication Date

January 1, 2018

DOI

10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx030

ISSN

2058-5225