Home
Scholarly Works
GRADE Leitlinien: 5. Einschätzung der Qualität der...
Journal article

GRADE Leitlinien: 5. Einschätzung der Qualität der Evidenz – Publikationsbias

Abstract

In the GRADE approach, randomized trials are classified as high quality evidence and observational studies as low quality evidence but both can be rated down if a body of evidence is associated with a high risk of publication bias. Even when individual studies included in best-evidence summaries have a low risk of bias, publication bias can result in substantial overestimates of effect. Authors should suspect publication bias when available evidence comes from a number of small studies most of which have been commercially funded. A number of approaches based on examination of the pattern of data are available to help assess publication bias. The most popular of these is the funnel plot; all, however, have substantial limitations. Publication bias is likely frequent, and caution in the face of early results, particularly with small sample size and number of events, is warranted.

Authors

Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ

Journal

Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, Vol. 106, No. 9, pp. 670–676

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

January 1, 2012

DOI

10.1016/j.zefq.2012.10.015

ISSN

1865-9217

Contact the Experts team