Journal article
Comparison of the age-adjusted and clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in the ED
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED) can be challenging because its signs and symptoms are non-specific.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and safety of using age-adjusted D-dimer interpretation, clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer interpretation and standard D-dimer approach to exclude PE in ED patients.
Authors
Sharif S; Eventov M; Kearon C; Parpia S; Li M; Jiang R; Sneath P; Fuentes CO; Marriott C; de Wit K
Journal
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 845–850
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
5 2019
DOI
10.1016/j.ajem.2018.07.053
ISSN
0735-6757