Home
Scholarly Works
Cost comparison of four revascularisation...
Journal article

Cost comparison of four revascularisation procedures for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An economic evaluation was performed, using modelling techniques, to compare 1-year total costs of four revascularisation procedures in patients with multivessel disease: on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); off-pump CABG; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare-metal stents (BMS); and PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS: Clinical data were derived from four randomised clinical trials comparing CABG versus PCI, as well as from literature reviews. Resource use and unit cost estimates were modelled to reflect current Canadian practice. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that 1 year after the initial revascularisation, PCI with BMS is the least costly procedure, followed by off-pump CABG, PCI with DES and on-pump CABG. DES became the most costly procedure if 3.5 or more DES were used or if staged PCI was performed.

Authors

Wang X; Rokoss M; Dyub A; Gafni A; Lamy A

Journal

Journal of Medical Economics, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 119–134

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Publication Date

May 8, 2008

DOI

10.3111/13696990801954756

ISSN

1369-6998

Contact the Experts team