Home
Scholarly Works
Preference-Based Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial...
Journal article

Preference-Based Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Clinical Decision Making

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient preferences and expert-generated clinical practice guidelines regarding treatment decisions may not be identical. The authors compared the thresholds for antithrombotic treatment from studies that determined or modeled the treatment preferences of patients with atrial fibrillation with recommendations from clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: Methods included MEDLINE identification, systematic review, and pooling with some reanalysis of primary data from relevant studies. RESULTS: Eight pertinent studies, including 890 patients, were identified. These studies used 3 methods (decision analysis, probability tradeoff, and decision aids) to determine or model patient preferences. All methods highlighted that the threshold above which warfarin was preferred over aspirin was highly variable. In 6 of 8 studies, patient preferences indicated that fewer patients would take warfarin compared to the recommendations of the guidelines. In general, at a stroke rate of 1% with aspirin, half of the participants would prefer warfarin, and at a rate of 2% with aspirin, two thirds would prefer warfarin. In 3 studies, warfarin must provide at least a 0.9% to 3.0% per year absolute reduction in stroke risk for patients to be willing to take it, corresponding to a stroke rate of 2% to 6% on aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with atrial fibrillation, treatment recommendations from clinical practice guidelines often differ from patient preferences, with substantial heterogeneity in their individual preferences. Since patient preferences can have a substantial impact on the clinical decision-making process, acknowledgment of their importance should be incorporated into clinical practice guidelines. Practicing physicians need to balance the patient preferences with the treatment recommendations from clinical practice guidelines.

Authors

Man-Son-Hing M; Gage BF; Montgomery AA; Howitt A; Thomson R; Devereaux PJ; Protheroe J; Fahey T; Armstrong D; Laupacis A

Journal

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 548–559

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Publication Date

September 1, 2005

DOI

10.1177/0272989x05280558

ISSN

0272-989X

Contact the Experts team