Home
Scholarly Works
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission...
Journal article

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography to diagnose recurrent cancer

Abstract

Background:Sometimes the diagnosis of recurrent cancer in patients with a previous malignancy can be challenging. This prospective cohort study assessed the clinical utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) in the diagnosis of clinically suspected recurrence of cancer.Methods:Patients were eligible if cancer recurrence (non-small-cell lung (NSCL), breast, head and neck, ovarian, oesophageal, Hodgkin’s or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) was suspected clinically, and if conventional imaging was non-diagnostic. Clinicians were asked to indicate their management plan before and after 18F-FDG PET-CT scanning. The primary outcome was change in planned management after 18F-FDG PET-CT.Results:Between April 2009 and June 2011, 101 patients (age, median 65 years; 55% female) were enroled from four cancer centres in Ontario, Canada. Distribution by primary tumour type was: NSCL (55%), breast (19%), ovarian (10%), oesophageal (6%), lymphoma (6%), and head and neck (4%). Of the 99 subjects who underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT, planned management changed after 18F-FDG PET-CT in 52 subjects (53%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 42–63%); a major change in plan from no treatment to treatment was observed in 38 subjects (38%, 95% CI, 29–49%), and was typically associated with 18F-FDG PET-CT findings that were positive for recurrent cancer (37 subjects). After 3 months, the stated post-18F-FDG PET-CT management plan was actually completed in 88 subjects (89%, 95% CI, 81–94%).Conclusion:In patients with suspected cancer recurrence and conventional imaging that is non-diagnostic, 18F-FDG PET-CT often provides new information that leads to important changes in patient management.

Authors

You JJ; Cline KJ; Gu C-S; Pritchard KI; Dayes IS; Gulenchyn KY; Inculet RI; Dhesy-Thind SK; Freeman MA; Chan AM

Journal

British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 112, No. 11, pp. 1737–1743

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

May 26, 2015

DOI

10.1038/bjc.2015.151

ISSN

0007-0920

Contact the Experts team