Home
Scholarly Works
Recovery-Oriented Service Provision and Clinical...
Journal article

Recovery-Oriented Service Provision and Clinical Outcomes in Assertive Community Treatment

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While the term "recovery" is routinely referenced in clinical services and health policy, few studies have examined the relationship between recovery-oriented service provision and client outcomes. The present study was designed to examine the relationship between recovery-orientation of service provision for persons with severe mental illnesses and outcomes in Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). METHODS: Client, family, staff, and manager ratings of service recovery-orientation and outcomes across a range of service utilization and community functioning indicators were examined among 67 ACT teams in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between ratings of recovery-oriented service provision and better outcomes in the domains of legal involvement, hospitalization days, education involvement, and employment. Results were not uniformly positive or consistent, however, across stakeholder Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA) ratings or outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These findings provide some preliminary support for an association between recovery-oriented service delivery for persons with severe mental illnesses and better outcomes. In line with the current practice commentary, this association would suggest the importance of evaluating and cultivating recovery-oriented values and practices in ACT contexts. This is a particularly salient point given that ACT standards minimally address key domains of recovery-oriented service provision. Further study is required, however, to determine if these findings apply to the implementation of ACT in other jurisdictions or generalize to other community support programs.

Authors

Kidd SA; George L; O’Connell M; Sylvestre J; Kirkpatrick H; Browne G; Odueyungbo AO; Davidson L

Journal

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 194–201

Publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

Publication Date

January 1, 2011

DOI

10.2975/34.3.2011.194.201

ISSN

1095-158X

Contact the Experts team