Home
Scholarly Works
Framework to assess the effects of using...
Journal article

Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management

Abstract

PurposeThe inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the routine clinical care of chronically ill patients has the potential to add valuable information about the impact of the disease and its treatment and promotes effective patient self-management in which patients become more active participants in their own care. PROMs provide clinicians with timely information on patients’ symptoms as well as functional and emotional status. PROMs are a useful tool for enhancing patient–clinician communication.MethodsWe develop a conceptual framework describing the potential effects of the use of PROMs in chronic care management. The framework summarizes insights from the methods for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and methods for the health technology assessment of diagnostic technologies and results from the relevant studies.ResultsThe framework describes potential effects, from proximal to distal, including communication (patient–clinician, patient–relative, clinician–clinician, and clinician–relative), engaging patients in shared clinical decision making, patient management (clinician management and patient self-management), and patient outcomes. Important potential effects also include enhancement in patient activation as well as improvements in clinician and patient satisfaction, and patient adherence to recommended treatment. Previous frameworks have described patient–physician communication, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes. Our framework adds unique domains, including patient engagement, patient activation, shared clinical decision making, and patient self-management.ConclusionsThe framework can be used as a tool to guide the development of interventions to improve chronic care management through the use of PROMs.

Authors

Santana M-J; Feeny D

Journal

Quality of Life Research, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 1505–1513

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

January 1, 2014

DOI

10.1007/s11136-013-0596-1

ISSN

0962-9343

Contact the Experts team