Clinical education models in rural practice settings: A scoping review
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AIM: The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize the literature on clinical nursing education models in rural settings, with the goal of developing a better understanding of effective clinical education models suitable for rural nursing education. BACKGROUND: Clinical education is an integral part of nursing education, yet very little clinical education occurs in rural and remote areas. This leaves the rural landscape vulnerable to inadequate health care staffing because many graduates will begin their nursing practice in the geographical areas where they studied. The rural nursing workforce is currently insufficient to meet the health care needs of rural populations. This insufficiency is likely to worsen because statistical trends suggest that rural and remote communities might be among the worst affected by the global nursing shortage. Many new graduate nurses are ill prepared for rural nursing practice, primarily due to limited exposure to rural nursing content and rural clinical experiences in their entry-to-practice education. Increasing opportunities for nursing students to learn in rural clinical settings will likely support the recruitment and retention of nurses in rural practice. Despite the key role of rural nursing education in sustaining the rural health workforce, little is known about rural clinical learning in nursing education. DESIGN: A scoping review. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using the steps outlined by Arksey and O'Malley with updated methodological guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Of 1880 potential data sources, 82 were included in data analysis. Although no distinct model of rural clinical nursing education could be identified, several features of clinical nursing education were described in the context of rural clinical learning. Preceptorship was the most used mentorship/clinical supervision model (n=41). The most common placement design was a block model design (n=41) lasting between one and 16 weeks, with most learners engaging in episodic care with individual clients (n=42). Interestingly, 24 sources reported learners engaging in rural clinical education across multiple contexts (e.g., acute care, home care, and primary care). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest there exists great variability in rural clinical learning opportunities for nursing students. Academic practice partnerships could continue to be leveraged to provide learners with rural clinical education that meets the needs of both the educational institution as well as the rural communities in which learning takes place. An area of further research would be to focus on formal evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical education models in the rural context.
