The impact of religion on changes in end-of-life practices in European intensive care units: a comparative analysis over 16 years Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • PURPOSE: Religious beliefs affect end-of-life practices in intensive care units (ICUs). Changes over time in end-of-life practices were not investigated regarding religions. METHODS: Twenty-two European ICUs (3 regions: Northern, Central, and Southern Europe) participated in both Ethicus-1 (years 1999-2000) and Ethicus-2 studies (years 2015-2016). Data of ICU patients who died or had limitations of life-sustaining therapy were analysed regarding changes in end-of-life practices and patient/physician religious affiliations. Frequencies, timing of decision-making, and religious affiliations of physicians/patients were compared using the same definitions. RESULTS: In total, 4592 adult ICU patients (n = 2807 Ethicus-1, n = 1785 Ethicus-2) were analysed. In both studies, patient and physician religious affiliations were mostly Catholic, Greek Orthodox, Jewish, Protestant, or unknown. Treating physicians (but not patients) commonly reported no religious affiliation (18%). Distribution of end-of-life practices with respect to religion and geographical regions were comparable between the two studies. Withholding [n = 1143 (40.7%) Ethicus-1 and n = 892 (50%) Ethicus-2] and withdrawing [n = 695 (24.8%) Ethicus-1 and n = 692 (38.8%) Ethicus-2] were most commonly decided. No significant changes in end-of-life practices were observed for any religion over 16 years. The number of end-of-life discussions with patients/ families/ physicians increased, while mortality and time until first decision decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in end-of-life practices observed over 16 years appear unrelated to religious affiliations of ICU patients or their treating physicians, but the effects of religiosity and/or culture could not be assessed. Shorter time until decision in the ICU and increased numbers of patient and family discussions may indicate increased awareness of the importance of end-of-life decision-making in the ICU.

authors

  • Schefold, Joerg C
  • Ruzzante, Livio
  • Sprung, Charles L
  • Gruber, Anastasiia
  • Soreide, Eldar
  • Cosgrove, Joseph
  • Mullick, Sudakshina
  • Papathanakos, Georgios
  • Koulouras, Vasilios
  • Maia, Paulo Azevedo
  • Ricou, Bara
  • Posch, Martin
  • Metnitz, Philipp
  • Bülow, Hans-Henrik
  • Avidan, Alexander
  • Sprung, C
  • Bernstein, R
  • Avidan, A
  • Sprung, Charles L
  • Anstey, Matthew
  • Avidan, Alexander
  • Azoulay, Elie
  • Benbenishty, Julie
  • Bin, Du
  • Cook, Deborah
  • Curtis, Randy
  • Feldman, Charles
  • Hartog, Christiane
  • Joynt, Gavin
  • Kainuma, Motoshi
  • Levy, Mitchell
  • Mani, RK
  • Michalsen, Andrej
  • Ricou, Bara
  • Soares, Marcio
  • Truog, Robert
  • Ledoux, D
  • Ingels, C
  • Nalos, D
  • Gjedsted, J
  • Hartog, C
  • Zakynthinos, S
  • Mathas, C
  • Nakos, G
  • Koulouras, B
  • Papathanakos, G
  • Miskolci, O
  • Sprung, CL
  • Avidan, A
  • de la Guardia, V
  • Farran, A
  • Van Heerden, V
  • Klein, M
  • Levin, P
  • Palo, A
  • Girbes, A
  • Maia, P
  • Bento, L
  • Garcia, JMG
  • Tegedor, A Vidal
  • Ricou, B
  • Marsch, S
  • Schefold, JC
  • Esen, F
  • Brealey, D

publication date

  • November 2023