Optimizing Sex Ratios of Hyalella azteca to Reduce Variability in Reproduction and Improve Reproductive Toxicity Test Methods

Standard toxicological test methods with Hyalella azteca incorporate both lethal and sublethal (growth, reproduction) endpoints, although lethal endpoints are often favored in routine testing. However, sublethal endpoints are important to consider because they are ecologically relevant and are often more sensitive than lethality. It is difficult to achieve robust data for reproduction in H. azteca because high biological variability is associated with reproductive yield, likely due to complex interactions in mate selection, which can add to the variability in brood sizes that females produce. In addition, effects on reproduction often co-occur with effects on growth, making it difficult to differentiate effects on growth from those on reproduction in standard tests initiated with juveniles. The present study characterized the reproductive capacity of H. azteca by investigating the role of sex ratios in reproductive yield. Experiments were initiated in the absence of toxicants with sexually mature (6-8-week-old) individuals that were placed in different female-to-male ratios (1:1, 2:3, 3:2, and 7:3). Reproduction was monitored during weekly static renewals for 7 weeks. The results indicated that a higher female:male ratio (seven females to three males) improved reproductive success and lowered biological variability in reproduction. In addition, the body lengths and weights of newly mature amphipods were used to create a size distribution to aid in the identification of small female amphipods. Based on the results of our study, a novel reproductive toxicity test method is proposed that begins with sexually mature amphipods in a ratio of seven females to three males to minimize reproductive variability in amphipods and to enable a more effective assessment of contaminants using reproduction as a highly sensitive endpoint. However, evaluation of this novel method with toxicants is needed to demonstrate that results are comparable to standard methods. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:712-722. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.