Agreement in reporting restrictions in life between children with epilepsy and their parents
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the parent-child agreement of the Hague Restrictions in Childhood Epilepsy Scale (HARCES) and identify the clinical factors associated with parent-child disagreement and the restrictions. METHODS: Data come from a clinical sample of 90 children ages 9-17 (mean age = 12.9, SD = 6.9, 54% male) attending a pediatric neurology clinic. Parents completed the HARCES, and children completed a modified child-friendly scale (HARCES-M). The parent-child agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and paired t-tests to compare parent and child responses. Logistic regression examined clinical factors associated with disagreement > 0.5 standard deviation. Associations between clinical factors and restriction scores were examined using linear regression. RESULTS: Parent-child agreement on the HARCES was poor (ICC = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.58), and parents reported fewer restrictions in daily activities (t(89) = 2.45, p = .016) and to attend parties (t(89) = 2.12, p = .038); however, the overall restrictions scores were not different (t(89) = 1.55, p = .125). The presence of convulsive seizures (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.75) and longer duration of epilepsy (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.41) were associated with parent-child disagreement. No clinical factors were significantly related to either the HARCES or HARCES-M scores. CONCLUSIONS: The disagreement in perceptions of restrictions highlights the need to use child-reported measures along with parental reports to comprehensively understand restrictions on children with epilepsy fully. More research is needed to understand what factors explain parent- and child-rated restrictions due to epilepsy.
