External ventricular drainage in the management of pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors and hydrocephalus: a retrospective cohort study

PurposeTo determine whether intraoperative adjunctive EVD placement in patients with a posterior fossa tumor (PFT) led to improved surgical, radiographic, and clinical outcomes compared to those who did not receive an EVD.MethodsPatients were grouped as those who underwent routine intraoperative adjunctive EVD insertion and those who did not at time of PFT resection. Patients who pre-operatively required a clinically indicated EVD insertion were excluded. Comparative analyses between both groups were conducted to evaluate clinical, radiological, and pathological outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for post-operative outcomes.ResultsFifty-five selected patients were included, 15 who had an EVD placed at the time of PFT resection surgery, and 40 who did not. Children without an EVD did not experience a higher rate of complications or poorer post-operative outcomes compared to those with an EVD placed during resection surgery. There was no significant difference in the degree of gross total resection (p = 0.129), post-operative CSF leak (p = 1.000), and post-operative hemorrhage (p = 0.554) between those with an EVD and those without. The frequency of new cranial nerve deficits post-operatively was higher in those with an EVD (40%) compared to those without (3%, p = 0.001). There was a trend towards more frequently observed post-operative hydrocephalus in the EVD group (p = 0.057).ConclusionThe routine use of EVD as an intraoperative adjunct in clinically stable pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors and hydrocephalus may not be associated with improved radiological or clinical outcomes.