A prospective randomized parallel-controlled pilot trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation for the management of small renal masses.
Conferences
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
363 Background: The potential of ablative technologies as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of small renal masses (SRMs) ≤4cm is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for SRMs in a prospective randomized pilot trial. Methods: Patients scheduled for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment at a single academic center were approached for the pilot trial, with the aim of recruiting 24 patients. Participants were assigned 1:1 to SBRT or RFA. Imaging (CT or MRI) using a renal tumor protocol is completed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-procedure. Biopsies were completed prior to the procedure and at 12 months. Multiple clinical parameters were collected. Follow-up visits will occur at 6 month intervals following the trial up to 5 years. SBRT included an initial simulation session and a single image-guided treatment session with a prescribed dose of 25 Gy. RFA was conducted by either percutaneous or laparoscopic access with 2 cycles of 8 minutes duration each upon reaching target temperature. Results: Beginning in December 2019, 24 patients were recruited and randomized (SBRT = 11; RFA = 13). Eleven had SBRT, 8 RFA, 3 have not yet had treatment, and 2 became ineligible. Median age for all patients was 67 (53,85) and 17 were male. A total of 17 patients had clear cell RCC, 6 had papillary RCC (type 1), and 1 had chromophobe RCC. All patients had T1a disease. Mean procedure length (minutes) for SBRT and RFA was 15.5±7.4 and 10.5±3.9, respectively. Two patients (both SBRT) had a 12-month biopsy showing no evidence of recurrence or metastases, while two patients (1 RFA, 1 SBRT) had a 9-month CT showing no recurrence. Data are pending for the remaining patients. An early grade 2 flare-up occurred in one SBRT patient. Conclusions: Recruitment and randomization of patients with SRMs in a SBRT vs. RFA prospective trial is feasible on a timeline that allows for regular follow-up and imaging. To date, both treatment modalities have been shown to have excellent short-term safety profiles.
