Home
Scholarly Works
A Trimodality Comparison of Volumetric Bone...
Journal article

A Trimodality Comparison of Volumetric Bone Imaging Technologies. Part III: SD, SEE, LSC Association With Fragility Fractures

Abstract

Part II of this 3-part series demonstrated 1-yr precision, standard error of the estimate, and 1-yr least significant change for volumetric bone outcomes determined using peripheral (p) quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and peripheral magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) modalities in vivo. However, no clinically relevant outcomes have been linked to these measures of change. This study examined 97 women with mean age of 75 ± 9 yr and body mass index of 26.84 ± 4.77 kg/m(2), demonstrating a lack of association between fragility fractures and standard deviation, least significant change and standard error of the estimate-based unit differences in volumetric bone outcomes derived from both pMRI and pQCT. Only cortical volumetric bone mineral density and cortical thickness derived from high-resolution pQCT images were associated with an increased odds for fractures. The same measures obtained by pQCT erred toward significance. Despite the smaller 1-yr and short-term precision error for measures at the tibia vs the radius, the associations with fractures observed at the radius were larger than at the tibia for high-resolution pQCT. Unit differences in cortical thickness and cortical volumetric bone mineral density able to yield a 50% increase in odds for fractures were quantified here and suggested as a reference for future power computations.

Authors

Wong AKO; Beattie KA; Min KKH; Merali Z; Webber CE; Gordon CL; Papaioannou A; Cheung AMW; Adachi JD

Journal

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 408–418

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

January 1, 2015

DOI

10.1016/j.jocd.2014.07.003

ISSN

1094-6950

Contact the Experts team