Home
Scholarly Works
The Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Critical...
Journal article

The Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Critical Walk Speed in Patients With COPD A Comparison With Self-Paced Walks

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Walking is frequently used in the exercise rehabilitation of patients with COPD. Walking ability can be characterized by the two-parameter hyperbolic relationship between endurance and speed. One parameter, critical walk speed (s_critical), represents the maximum speed that can be endured indefinitely. The purpose of this study was to: (1) determine the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on the critical speed and (2) compare the critical speed with the speed chosen during self-paced walking. METHODS: We estimated critical speed in patients with COPD before and after rehabilitation. Patients completed four high-intensity constant-speed walk tests to intolerance on a 30-m course. The parameters of the hyperbolic relationship were determined using nonlinear regression of endurance on speed. Participants also completed self-paced walks: (1) for as long as they could, (2) at their "usual" and "fast" speeds, and (3) as a 6-min walk test. RESULTS: Twelve participants (FEV(1) [SD], 41 [16] % predicted; FEV(1)/FVC, 41 [12]) completed the study. At baseline, the critical speed (65 [12] m/min) was not significantly different from the self-paced, usual, or 6-min walk speeds (65 [12], 67 [14], and 63 [15] m/min, respectively). There was a significant increase in critical speed (6 [1-10] m/min) and 6-min speed (16 [10-21] m/min) after rehabilitation, without changes in the self-paced, usual, or fast speeds. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD increase their critical walk speed after pulmonary rehabilitation. The pace chosen during common walk tasks is closely related to critical speed; this relationship is altered after rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00781183; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Authors

Dolmage TE; Evans RA; Hill K; Blouin M; Brooks D; Goldstein RS

Journal

Chest, Vol. 141, No. 2, pp. 413–419

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

January 1, 2012

DOI

10.1378/chest.11-1059

ISSN

0012-3692

Contact the Experts team