Stability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System, Manual Ability Classification System, and Communication Function Classification System
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AimTo determine the stability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), and Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) over 1‐year and 2‐year intervals using a process for consensus classification between parents and therapists.MethodParticipants were 664 children with cerebral palsy (CP), 18 months to 12 years of age, one of their parents, and 90 therapists. Consensus between parents and therapists on level of function was ≥92% for the GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS. A linearly weighted kappa coefficient of ≥0.75 was the criterion for stability.ResultsKappa coefficients varied from 0.76 to 0.88 for the GMFCS, 0.59 to 0.73 for the MACS, and 0.57 to 0.77 for the CFCS. For children younger than 4 years of age, level of function did not change for 58.2% on the GMFCS, 30.3% on the MACS, and 39.3% on the CFCS. For children 4 years of age or older, level of function did not change for 72.3% on the GMFCS, 49.1% on the MACS, and 55% on the CFCS.InterpretationThe findings support repeated classification of children over time. The kappa coefficients for the GMFCS are attributed to descriptions of levels for each age band. Consensus classification facilitates discussion between parents and professionals that has implications for shared decision‐making.What this paper addsThe findings support repeated classification of children over time.Stability was higher for the Gross Motor Function Classification System than the Manual Ability Classification System and Communication Function Classification System.The function of younger children was more likely to be reclassified.Percentage agreement between parents and therapists using consensus classification varied from 92% to 97%.The intraclass correlation coefficient overestimated stability compared with the weighted kappa coefficient.
