Risk of Stent Thrombosis and Major Bleeding with Bivalirudin Compared with Active Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is commonly used for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but there have been recent concerns that it may be associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis and provide no benefit regarding major bleeding compared with active control. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and conference proceedings for randomized controlled trials of bivalirudin versus active control in patients undergoing PCI. The main outcomes of interest were definite stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and mortality. We used random-effects modeling to pool the data. We included 25 trials involving 41,243 patients. Overall, use of bivalirudin compared with active control was associated with an increased risk of definite stent thrombosis (11 trials; 16,864 patients; RR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.24-2.40; P<0.001; I(2)=0%), similar risk of acute myocardial infarction (22 trials; 40,578 patients; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87-1.16; P=0.96; I(2)=43%), decreased risk of major bleeding (25 trials; 41,243 patients; RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.72; P<0.001; I(2)=31%) and of cardiac death (6 trials; 6,956 patients; RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.99; P=0.05; I(2)=0%), but no change in all-cause mortality (24 trials; 41,058 patients; RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.15; P=0.69; I(2)=0%). Results were consistent across a wide set of subgroup and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with active control, bivalirudin is associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis but lower risk of major bleeding, with no discernible impact on all-cause mortality.
