Isotonic versus hypotonic fluid supplementation in term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia – a double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial

AbstractAim: To compare the incidence of hyponatremia in full‐term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia, receiving intravenous fluid supplementation with 0.2% saline in 5% dextrose versus 0.9% saline in 5% dextrose, to prevent blood exchange transfusion (BET).Methods: In this double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial, full‐term newborns (≥37 weeks), appropriate for gestational age, with severe non‐haemolytic hyperbilirubinemia (serum bilirubin ≥ 20 mg/dL) were enrolled. Eligible neonates were randomized to receive either 0.2% saline in 5% dextrose (hypotonic fluid group) or 0.9% saline in 5% dextrose (isotonic fluid group) over 8 hrs, in addition to phototherapy. The primary outcome was proportion of neonates developing hyponatremia (serum Na < 135 mmol/L) after 8 h.Results: Forty‐two neonates were analysed in each group. Proportion of neonates developing hyponatremia after 8 h was higher in hypotonic fluid group as compared to isotonic fluid group (48.8% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001). However, a larger proportion in isotonic fluid group developed hypernatremia (39.5% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). The rate of BET was similar in both groups.Conclusion: In full‐term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia, administration of hypotonic fluid to prevent BET was associated with a higher incidence of hyponatremia while isotonic fluid was associated with an increased incidence of hypernatremia.

Isotonic versus hypotonic fluid supplementation in term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia – a double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial Journal Articles