Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Internal Fixation Versus Arthroplasty of...
Journal article

Internal Fixation Versus Arthroplasty of Comminuted Fractures of the Distal Humerus

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A comminuted distal humerus fracture in an older patient is a difficult clinical problem. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) carries the risks of nonunion, loss of fixation, infection, and stiffness. Arthroplasty carries the risks of loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture. Both procedures are technically challenging, and complications following these procedures are frequent. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate best available …

Authors

Obremskey WT; Bhandari M; Dirschl DR; Shemitsch E

Journal

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 463–465

Publisher

Wolters Kluwer

Publication Date

July 2003

DOI

10.1097/00005131-200307000-00014

ISSN

0890-5339