Journal article
Conventional versus Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Time for Shift in Indications?
Abstract
Background The incidence of degenerative aortic valve diseases has increased along with the life expectancy of our population. Although conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the gold standard for symptomatic aortic stenosis, transcatheter procedures have proven to be a valid therapeutic option in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare these procedures in a high-risk cohort. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all …
Authors
Baumbach H; Ahad S; Rustenbach C; Hill S; Schäufele T; Wachter K; Franke UFW
Journal
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Vol. 65, No. 03, pp. 212–217
Publisher
Thieme
Publication Date
April 2017
DOI
10.1055/s-0036-1586491
ISSN
0171-6425
Associated Experts
Fields of Research (FoR)
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisFemaleGermanyHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHemodynamicsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStroke VolumeTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, Left