Home
Scholarly Works
Genetic moderation on the relationship between...
Journal article

Genetic moderation on the relationship between brain white matter hyperintensities and amyloid‐beta

Abstract

AbstractBackground

Brain white matter hyperintensities (WMH) are vascular lesions commonly observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD). WMH were previously shown to be associated with greater brain amyloid, but the molecular pathways underlying their complex relation remain unclear. Here, we aim to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) that modify the relationship between WMH and AD amyloid biomarkers.

Method

We conducted a genome‐wide interaction study in participants with AD, mild cognitive impairment, and normal cognition from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). WMH were measured from FLAIR MRI using an automated atlas‐based segmentation. Amyloid‐β 42 (Aβ42) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured using immunoassays. Interactions between SNPs and WMH volumes on CSF‐Aβ42 were assessed via a linear regression model adjusting for age, sex, diagnosis, MMSE, APOE‐ε4 status, head‐size, and 4 genetic principal components in PLINK2. The most influential SNP was identified via Sum of Single Effects (SuSiE) regression. Significant SNP‐WMH interactions were validated in participants from the UK Biobank (UKB) with available plasma‐Aβ42 data quantified by liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry. SNP‐WMH interactions in relation to amyloid pathology (diffuse and neuritic plaque burden) was investigated in the Religious Orders Study/Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP).

Result

A 28‐variant intergenic locus on chromosome 18 (top SNP: rs72899960 T>A, p = 5.66x10‐9, MAF=11.1%, Imputation R2>0.99%, n = 863) interacted with WMH to predict Aβ42 (nearest gene: U7 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) XR_007066478.1 [‐111KB]). The effect of this SNP was also significant in the dominant and recessive genetic models (relative to the minor A‐allele). This SNP‐WMH interaction was replicated in UKB (n = 645) in both additive (B=0.91, p = 0.017) and dominant models (B=0.96, p = 0.024). In ROSMAP (n = 195), significant SNP‐WMH interaction was observed on diffuse plaque burden in the additive (B=‐0.46, p = 0.049) and dominant (B=‐0.51, p = 0.046) models. The minor A‐allele exhibited a protective effect by being associated with higher circulating Aβ42 (in ADNI and UKB) and lower diffuse plaque burden (in ROSMAP) in individuals with greater WMH.

Conclusion

Genomic variants moderated the relationship between WMH and amyloid biomarkers, suggesting a novel regulatory role for snRNA. This genome‐wide interaction study highlights the potential contributions of snRNA and related pathways to the relationship between vascular disease and amyloid biomarkers in AD.

Authors

Wong YY; Wu C; Mori‐Fegan DK; Noor S; Xiong LY; Ryoo SW; Ruthirakuhan M; Mirza SS; Masellis M; Rogaeva E

Journal

Alzheimer's & Dementia, Vol. 21, No. Suppl 1,

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

December 1, 2025

DOI

10.1002/alz70855_103613

ISSN

1552-5260

Contact the Experts team