Home
Scholarly Works
0774 Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists for...
Conference

0774 Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have gained recent popularity in its usage for weight loss in people with diabetes and obesity. There is also emerging evidence of its usage for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) which can be caused by or worsened by obesity. However, there is limited synthesized evidence for the usage of GLP-a receptor agonists for people with OSA. Methods We performed a PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with OSA. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched up to June 30th, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating the usage of any GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with OSA that reported OSA symptom outcomes as measured by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) measured effect size. Q and I2 tests measured heterogeneity. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 assessed risk of bias. Results Six studies were included which consisted of 1023 participants with moderate to severe OSA. 516 participants received GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment for their OSA with 507 in the control group (receiving either placebo or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)). GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy for OSA when compared to placebo groups had an medium effect size of SMD = - 0.601 (95% CI: - 0.969 to - 0.233, p = 0.001). When compared to CPAP treatment, there was no significant difference in AHI differences post-treatment (p = 0.297). Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the current evidence which supports the potential usage of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of OSA. This pharmaceutical treatment option would increase the treatment options available for people with OSA. However, the literature is limited by the few RCTs available, small sample sizes, and lack of long-term follow-up data. Further studies are needed in this area. Support (if any)

Authors

Wong S; Fabiano N; Zhou C; Luu B; Shorr R; Solmi M; Husain I; Mak M

Volume

48

Pagination

pp. a335-a335

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Publication Date

May 19, 2025

DOI

10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.0774

Conference proceedings

Sleep

Issue

Supplement_1

ISSN

0161-8105

Contact the Experts team