Home
Scholarly Works
Performance Characteristics for Physiological...
Journal article

Performance Characteristics for Physiological Measures of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Abstract

Rationale: Clinical measures of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) have been proposed, but their clinical utility remains unclear. Objectives: To determine performance characteristics of lung function-based PPF measures, including new guideline criteria for discriminating clinically relevant outcomes. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort analysis was performed to assess the performance characteristics of eight categorical measures of FVC and DlCO decline, together with PPF guideline criteria (requiring two of the following: worsening respiratory symptoms, absolute decline in FVC ⩾5% or DlCO ⩾15%, or radiological progression) for discriminating 2-year death or lung transplant among patients fibrotic interstitial lung disease from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada (n = 2,727). The net benefit of the top-performing measures to inform treatment initiation were compared using decision curves. Measurements and Main Results: PPF classified according to relative decline in FVC of ⩾10%, relative decline in DlCO of ⩾15%, and PPF guideline criteria displayed the best overall test performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.67-0.68. Specificity was higher than sensitivity for all evaluated measures, with relative measures of lung function decline outperforming absolute measures. The net benefit of standalone relative decline in FVC ⩾10% and DlCO ⩾15% was similar to PPF guideline criteria across the range of treatment probability thresholds. Conclusions: Classifying PPF by standalone measures of FVC and DlCO decline provides clinical utility similar to PPF guideline criteria. Top-performing physiology-based measures of PPF discriminate outcomes with high specificity but low sensitivity.

Authors

Newton CA; Thenappan A; Liu GY; Yazbeck L; Lee CT; Pugashetti JV; Wang JM; White E; Flaherty KR; Belloli EA

Journal

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 211, No. 10, pp. 1867–1875

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Publication Date

October 1, 2025

DOI

10.1164/rccm.202501-0317oc

ISSN

1073-449X

Contact the Experts team