Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Efficacy of secondary vs primary closure...
Journal article

Efficacy of secondary vs primary closure techniques for the prevention of postoperative complications after impacted mandibular third molar extractions A systematic review update and meta-analysis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether secondary closure (SC) or primary closure (PC) is better at preventing postoperative complications after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors sought randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of PC and SC on pain, swelling, trismus, infection, and bleeding after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction. Screening, data …

Authors

Azab M; Ibrahim S; Li A; Khosravirad A; Carrasco-Labra A; Zeng L; Brignardello-Petersen R

Journal

The Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 153, No. 10, pp. 943–956.e48

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

10 2022

DOI

10.1016/j.adaj.2022.04.007

ISSN

0002-8177