Journal article
Outcome assessment for clinical trials: How many adjudicators do we need?
Abstract
Considerable effort is often expended to adjudicate outcomes in clinical trials, but little has been written on the administration of the adjudication process and its possible impact on study results. As a case study, we describe the function and performance of an adjudication committee in a large randomized trial of two diagnostic approaches to potentially operable lung cancer. Up to five independent adjudicators independently determined two …
Authors
Walter SD; Cook DJ; Guyatt GH; King D; Group1 STFTCLO
Journal
Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 27–42
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
2 1997
DOI
10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00131-6
ISSN
1551-7144
Associated Experts
Fields of Research (FoR)
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Cause of DeathCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingDocumentationFollow-Up StudiesGuidelines as TopicHumansLung NeoplasmsMediastinoscopyModels, OrganizationalMulticenter Studies as TopicObserver VariationOdds RatioOutcome Assessment, Health CareProfessional Staff CommitteesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTomography, X-Ray Computed