Home
Scholarly Works
Frailty and associated prognosis among older...
Journal article

Frailty and associated prognosis among older emergency department patients with suspected infection: A prospective, observational cohort study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognosis and disposition among older emergency department (ED) patients with suspected infection remains challenging. Frailty is increasingly recognized as a predictor of poor prognosis among critically ill patients; however, its association with clinical outcomes among older ED patients with suspected infection is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study at two tertiary care EDs. We included older ED patients (≥75 years) with suspected infection. Frailty at baseline (before index illness) was explicitly measured for all patients by the treating physicians using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We defined frailty as a CFS 5-8. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for known confounders. We also compared the prognostic accuracy of frailty with the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria. RESULTS: We enrolled 203 patients, of whom 117 (57.6%) were frail. Frail patients were more likely to develop septic shock (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.51) and more likely to die within 30 days of ED presentation (aOR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.02-5.24). Sensitivity for mortality was highest among the CFS (73.1%; 95% CI, 52.2-88.4), compared with SIRS ≥ 2 (65.4%; 95% CI, 44.3-82.8) or qSOFA ≥ 2 (38.4; 95% CI, 20.2-59.4). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is a highly prevalent prognostic factor that can be used to risk-stratify older ED patients with suspected infection. ED clinicians should consider screening for frailty to optimize disposition in this population.

Authors

Fernando SM; Guo KH; Lukasik M; Rochwerg B; Cook DJ; Kyeremanteng K; Perry JJ

Journal

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 687–691

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

September 1, 2020

DOI

10.1017/cem.2020.377

ISSN

1481-8035
View published work (Non-McMaster Users)

Contact the Experts team