Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Validity of Composite Outcomes in Meta-Analyses of...
Journal article

Validity of Composite Outcomes in Meta-Analyses of Stroke Prevention Trials: The Case of Aspirin

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aspirin has been reported to be less effective for secondary vascular prevention in patients with ischaemic stroke, compared with other high-risk populations. This contention is largely based on results of meta-analyses that used a composite outcome of vascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, reporting a 13% relative risk reduction. In this study, we explore whether the summary relative risk reduction for this composite …

Authors

McGrath E; O’Conghaile A; Eikelboom JW; Dinneen SF; Oczkowski C; O’Donnell MJ

Journal

Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 22–27

Publisher

Karger Publishers

Publication Date

2011

DOI

10.1159/000324629

ISSN

1015-9770