Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Conventional...
Journal article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Conventional Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Surgically Ineligible Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In 25% to 35% of patients with early stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgery is not feasible, and external-beam radiation becomes their standard treatment. Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) is the traditional radiation treatment standard; however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly being adopted as an alternate radiation treatment. Our objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness …

Authors

Mitera G; Swaminath A; Rudoler D; Seereeram C; Giuliani M; Leighl N; Gutierrez E; Dobrow MJ; Coyte PC; Yung T

Journal

JCO Oncology Practice, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. e130–e136

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date

5 2014

DOI

10.1200/jop.2013.001206

ISSN

2688-1527