Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Outcome Assessment by Central Adjudicators Versus...
Journal article

Outcome Assessment by Central Adjudicators Versus Site Investigators in Stroke Trials

Abstract

Background and Purpose- In randomized stroke trials, central adjudication of a trial's primary outcome is regularly implemented. However, recent evidence questions the importance of central adjudication in randomized trials. The aim of this review was to compare outcomes assessed by central adjudicators with outcomes assessed by site investigators. Methods- We included randomized stroke trials where the primary outcome had undergone an …

Authors

Godolphin PJ; Bath PM; Algra A; Berge E; Brown MM; Chalmers J; Duley L; Eliasziw M; Gregson J; Greving JP

Journal

Stroke, Vol. 50, No. 8, pp. 2187–2196

Publisher

Wolters Kluwer

Publication Date

August 2019

DOI

10.1161/strokeaha.119.025019

ISSN

0039-2499