Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for...
Journal article

A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for assessing effect modification claims in randomized trials or meta-analyses

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to systematically survey the methodological literature and collect suggested criteria for assessing the credibility of effect modification and associated rationales. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and WorldCat up to March 2018 for publications providing guidance for assessing the credibility of effect modification identified in randomized trials or meta-analyses. Teams of two …

Authors

Schandelmaier S; Chang Y; Devasenapathy N; Devji T; Kwong JSW; Colunga Lozano LE; Lee Y; Agarwal A; Bhatnagar N; Ewald H

Journal

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 113, , pp. 159–167

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

September 2019

DOI

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.014

ISSN

0895-4356