Home
Scholarly Works
Nomogram-based risk prediction of local and...
Conference

Nomogram-based risk prediction of local and distant relapse after radical cystectomy, and role of perioperative chemotherapy, in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): A multicenter study.

Abstract

448 Background: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy improve relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival of patients (pts) with MIBC. Limited information is available regarding risk prediction of local (R L ) vs. distant relapse (R D ), including role of perioperative chemotherapy (POC), added to radical cystectomy (Cy). Methods: Data from 1,559 pts, treated at 29 centers from the U.S., Europe, Israel, and Canada, were collected. Pts received Cy for MIBC from 02/90 to 12/13. Of these pts, 782 (50.2%) received POC and Cy, 777 (49.8%) Cy alone. R L and R D were defined as follows: pelvic lymph-nodes/soft tissue only and any extra-pelvic recurrences, respectively. Cumulative incidence methods were used to estimate time-to-(TT) R L /R D , which accounts for the competing risk of other types of relapse. Univariable and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression analyses were performed from the complete-case dataset (n = 1,082). Risk groups were defined according to the number of adverse factors, with corresponding nomogram-based R L and R D risk estimation. All tests were two-sided and statistical significance was defined as a p-value of 0.05 or less. Results: A total of 830 pts (55%) developed a relapse, 447 in the Cy group and 383 in the Cy+POC group. On MVA, POC administration was associated with longer TTR L (p < 0.001) and TTR D (p < 0.001). Other factors associated with R L : histology (non-UC, odds ratio [OR] = 1.47, 95%CI: 1.07-2.01, p = 0.022), pT-stage (p < 0.001), pN-stage (p = 0.038), surgical margins (p < 0.001). For R D : Charlson score (p = 0.006), pT-stage (p < 0.001), pN-stage (p < 0.001). The c-index of the model for R L was 0.685 (95% bootstrapped CI: 0.664-0.718), and for R D was 0.684 (0.655-0.721). Three risk group categories were obtained for both endpoints (0, 1-2, and > 2 risk factors). Results were confirmed after applying 90-day or 180-day landmark analyses, pending external validation. Conclusions: In the largest study that separately analyzed R L and R D risk, we were able to provide risk tools that may be used to optimize locoregional treatments and compare POC benchmark with new drugs in the perioperative setting.

Authors

Necchi A; Pond GR; Plimack ER; Niegisch G; Yu EY; Pal SK; Bamias A; Agarwal N; Alva AS; Srinivas S

Volume

36

Pagination

pp. 448-448

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date

February 20, 2018

DOI

10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.448

Conference proceedings

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Issue

6_suppl

ISSN

0732-183X
View published work (Non-McMaster Users)

Contact the Experts team